There are many points that can be analyzed, such as plot, characters, author\'s background, etc. But the more common and difficult analysis mainly focuses on two aspects:
1 comments
To post a comment you must firstlog in
related suggestion
If students learn other types of argumentative essays, will it be helpful for writing in English literature classes in grades 9 and 10 at American high schools?
Let me start with the conclusion: learning other types of argumentative essays will be of some help to the writing of English literature classes in grades 9 and 10 of American high schools, but this help is relatively limited.
Are writing and academic writing in American high school English classes the same thing? Are they different?
Academic writing is a very broad definition, which includes many different types of writing, such as argumentative essays, persuasive essays, research papers, etc. as we mentioned above.
What are the English courses at U.S. High School? What kind of writing do you usually learn?
What are the English courses at U.S. High School? What kind of writing do you usually learn? The English courses at American high schools will study English literary works and conduct in-depth analysis of them, including analysis of plots, characters, backgrounds, etc., but the most difficult an ...
First, rhetorical techniques. For example, the teacher will ask students to analyze the role of certain rhetorical devices, such as similes, metaphors, symbols, personification, etc. But many times, Chinese students have not been exposed to these rhetorical techniques before, so this is a difficult point.
Second, the theme. The so-called theme is the message that the author is conveying. There are many themes with two words, such as ambition, ambition, money, self-esteem, hero, etc. The most common problem with Chinese students' analysis of themes is that they are superficial. They briefly mention these themes in the article, but there is no in-depth analysis of how these themes are discussed in literary works and what their significance is.
For example, a relatively shallow analysis would say that Macbeth is a very ambitious man. As we said above, anyone who has read this work can basically draw this conclusion. Therefore, if an article only proves that Macbeth is an ambitious person, then it will definitely not get high marks.
An in-depth analysis will say that Macbeth has excessive ambition, and his excessive ambition also led to his ultimate failure. This kind of analysis is very layered. Students not only have to explain that Macbeth is an ambitious person, but also prove that he has excessive ambition, and how his ambition made him become an arrogant person step by step, and how it led to his final fate. fail. Students must not only analyze the development of the character Macbeth, but also analyze his environment, the events he experienced, and the changes in his heart, as well as how ambition affects him.
From the comparison of the above two analyses, you can see that good and in-depth analysis requires students to explain and demonstrate the significance of a certain theme of a certain work in a layered manner. The quality and depth of the analysis are precisely The fundamental difference between getting a B or an A in an English literature course in an American high school.